Tuesday, February 13, 2018

“This Mutant Crayfish Clones Itself, and It's Taking Over Europe"

Sarah Goodell
Mr. Ippolito
AP Bio: Current Event Review
12 February, 2018
Current Event #16
Zimmer, Carl. “This Mutant Crayfish Clones Itself, and It's Taking Over Europe.” The New York
This week, I read the article titled “This Mutant Crayfish Clones Itself, and It's Taking Over Europe” by The New York Times author Carl Zimmer. In this article, Zimmer discusses how these six-inch-long marbled crayfish are miraculously able to clone themselves, thanks to a mutation 25 years ago which also gave rise to their species. In 2003, scientists confirmed that these crayfish did have the ability to clone themselves. They tested this theory by sequencing small bits of DNA from the animals, noticing that they were very similar to another type of crayfish native to North and Central America. Dr. Frank Lyko, a biologist at the German Cancer Research Center, sequenced the genomes of 15 other specimens, which allowed him a clearer look at the origins of the marbled crayfish. As Zimmer writes, “...instead of reproducing sexually, the first marbled crayfish was able to induce her own eggs to start dividing into embryos. The offspring, all females, inherited identical copies of her three sets of chromosomes. They were clones.” Therefore, Dr. Lyko discovered that these animals originally evolved as a result of a mutation when two slough crayfish mated, creating only female offspring.
Although this topic is not one that brings up an issue that needs to be dealt with, Zimmer’s article is relevant because he discusses one of the wonders of the natural world. His article brings up the idea that life is ever-changing and as humans, we can never predict what will truly occur. The fact that these crayfish are able to duplicate without male counterparts and developed because of one mutation in a few offspring demonstrates the miracles of life. The natural world is also still much of a mystery to humans because we have very little way of knowing if this new species of crayfish will survive for another 100,000 years or for only another 100 years. This topic is important to learn about because it emphasizes the idea that there is always more to discover and it is critical for us to understand as much as possible about our changing world.

Zimmer did a great job writing this article; however, he can improve upon a few points in the future. Firstly, Zimmer provided his audience with a chronological summary of events over the past 30 years, beginning with the discovery of this new species of crayfish and ending with the most recent study on these animals. Although Zimmer included a couple quotes from Dr. Lyko, he can try discussing more studies and expanding on how these scientists performed their studies, research, and tests to discover more about these animals and their incredible ability. Overall, Zimmer did a great job writing a thorough, yet understandable article for his diverse audience, but could include more detail about the specific studies in his next works.

5 comments:

  1. Gigi Chrappa
    AP Biology
    Current Event Comment
    February 14, 2018

    Zimmer, Carl. “This Mutant Crayfish Clones Itself, and It's Taking Over Europe.” The New York
    Times, The New York Times, 5 Feb. 2018, www.nytimes.com/2018/02/05/science/mutant-crayfish-clones-europe.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fscience&action=click&contentCollection=science®ion=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=8&pgtype=sectionfront&mtrref=www.nytimes.com&gwh=BB4B6A66ABFC062AC1C1619A95BF2F9B&gwt=pay.

    This week, I decided to read Sarah’s review of the article, “This Mutant Crayfish Clones Itself, and It’s Taking Over Europe”. Sarah did a wonderful job of reviewing the NY Times article. She did a wonderful job of including specific details from her article which added credibility and made the read more interesting. In addition to this, Sarah successfully summarized her article. With a wild title such as “This Mutant Crayfish Clones Itself, and It’s Taking Over Europe”, the article definitely needs some explaining for the average reader to understand. She gave a short and concise, yet clear enough to follow with ease, summary of the topic. From this, I learned that a mutation in crayfish twenty-five years ago led to crayfish being able to produce asexually. Lastly, Sarah successfully and professionally critiqued the author of her article. She provided positive feedback and areas of improvement for her author.
    And while Sarah wrote a superb review, there are areas in which Sarah could improve upon in the future. For example, it might have been interesting for Sarah to do outside research and find other sources dealing with this topic as well. Many times, it is best to hear several points of views to come to an educated conclusion. And since Dr. Zimmer is the only scientist mentioned throughout her review, it might be interesting to hear the viewpoint from another scientist or doctor. Also, it might be interesting for Sarah to do even further research on the crayfish. It would be interesting to hear how this advancement could possibly influence science in the future. The fact that these crayfish began mutating around twenty-five years ago and have now been able to reproduce asexually could mean big things for science. It would be very fascinating to find out what this might mean for the future.

    ReplyDelete
  2. David Weild
    AP Biology
    CE 17
    February 28, 2018

    Zimmer, Carl. “This Mutant Crayfish Clones Itself, and It's Taking Over Europe.” The New York
    Times, The New York Times, 5 Feb. 2018, www.nytimes.com/2018/02/05/science/mutant-crayfish-clones-europe.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fscience&action=click&contentCollection=science®ion=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=8&pgtype=sectionfront&mtrref=www.nytimes.com&gwh=BB4B6A66ABFC062AC1C1619A95BF2F9B&gwt=pay.


    This week I read Sarah’s review of “This Mutant Crayfish Clones Itself, and It’s Taking Over Europe.” Sarah did a good giving summary of the article. She included specific details from the article which added credibility. Also, Sarah summarized her article. The article definitely needed this summarization.It was short and concise and made it easy for the reader to follow. Learning about crayfish producing asexually was very interesting. Finally, Sarah’s critique was exceptional. She provided great feedback, good and bad of the article and did not hold back.
    Some things however, Sarah could improve on. Sarah could have done more outside research to offer more insight.In addition, I found some incorrect punctuation. To fix this would allow for an easier read. I recommend that she proof reads her work before turning it in. The fact that these crayfish began mutating around twenty-five years ago and can reproduce asexually is very interesting. I am planning on doing more research on this topic.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Abbey Thomas
    Mr. Ippolito
    AP Biology
    1 March 2018
    Zimmer, Carl. “This Mutant Crayfish Clones Itself, and It's Taking Over Europe.” The New York
    Times, The New York Times, 5 Feb. 2018, www.nytimes.com/2018/02/05/science/mutant-crayfish-clones-europe.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fscience&action=click&contentCollection=science®ion=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=8&pgtype=sectionfront&mtrref=www.nytimes.com&gwh=BB4B6A66ABFC062AC1C1619A95BF2F9B&gwt=pay.

    For this current event, I reviewed Sarah’s response to Carl Zimmer’s article entitled “This Mutant Crayfish Clones Itself, and It’s Taking Over Europe”. Sarah had many good aspects to her current event, for example she included background information on the crayfish and when the mutation arrived, so that the reader would not be confused on how recent the mutant crayfish were. Also, she explained how the mutant crayfish clone themselves, which was helpful information. Without information on how the crayfish clone themselves, readers could have become confused on how the process takes place, and would assume how it occured. Lastly, Sarah added in the importance of the finding of the mutant crayfish, and the discovery that they clone themselves. Sarah wrote, “This topic is important to learn about because it emphasizes the idea that there is always more to discover and it is critical for us to understand as much as possible about our changing world”.
    While there were many aspects to Sarah’s response to Zimmer’s article on the cloning of mutant crayfish, there were some areas of her current event that she could improve on. She did include information on the importance of the discovery of cloning, but did not include information on how they were taking over Europe. If she had added this information, it would be clear to the readers why we need to be concerned about these crayfish. Lastly, Sarah could have included quotes from the sources (researchers, academic papers, etc.) used by Zimmer, rather than quoting Zimmer, to give credibility to her writing.
    From reading Sarah’s response to Zimmer’s article I learned about how the mutant crayfish first evolved into a species and how they clone themselves. I did know about the mutant crayfish before reading her article, but reading it helped me understand how they clone and why. Overall, Sarah did a fantastic job on her current event. Fro


    ReplyDelete
  4. Olivia Doyle
    Mr. Ippolito
    AP Biology
    8 March 201
    Zimmer, Carl. “This Mutant Crayfish Clones Itself, and It's Taking Over Europe.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 5 Feb. 2018, www.nytimes.com/2018/02/05/science/mutant-crayfish-clones-europe.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fscience&action=click&contentCollection=science®ion=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=8&pgtype=sectionfront&mtrref=www.nytimes.com&gwh=BB4B6A66ABFC062AC1C1619A95BF2F9B&gwt=pay.
    This week, I read my classmate and dear friend Sarah’s review of the article “This Mutant Crayfish Clones Itself, and It's Taking Over Europe.” The article discusses a type of crayfish that has a genetic mutation giving it the ability to clone itself. Sarah did a good job of explaining how scientists were able to discover this, which gave the reader a better understanding of the discovery as a whole. Secondly, Sarah used quotes from researchers in her summary, which gives her article credibility. She used the quote “ The offspring, all females, inherited identical copies of her three sets of chromosomes. They were clones,” which provides key details on the discovery. Lastly, Sarah gave excellent advice to her author in her analysis, giving the reader insight into her own thoughts on the article.
    Although Sarah did a very good job of writing this review, there are some areas which she could have improved on. For one, I think she should have gone more in-depth in her second paragraph, talking about how this discovery connects to humanity and what it means for science as a whole. She could have connected these crayfish to another organism that is able to clone itself. Secondly, I think Sarah should have included more analysis on what her author did well.
    Overall, I found this article and Sarah’s review very interesting and informative. I did not know that any organism had the ability to clone itself, and that cloning could be the result of a mutation in the DNA sequence. Like Sarah said, I think it will be interesting to see if this species thrives or dies out in the future, as it will provide vital information about cloning in species as a whole.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Isabella Dibbini
    Mr. Ippolito
    AP Bio
    April 10, 2018

    Zimmer, Carl. “This Mutant Crayfish Clones Itself, and It's Taking Over Europe.” The New York
    Times, The New York Times, 5 Feb. 2018, www.nytimes.com/2018/02/05/science/mutant-crayfish-clones-europe.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fscience&action=click&contentCollection=science®ion=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=8&pgtype=sectionfront&mtrref=www.nytimes.com&gwh=BB4B6A66ABFC062AC1C1619A95BF2F9B&gwt=pay.
    Sarah wrote an excellent review of the article “This Mutant Crayfish Clones Itself, and It's Taking Over Europe” by The New York Times author Carl Zimmer.. She developed an accurate summary of the article and went into great detail when explaining her ideas. In addition, she incorporated few quotes into her review to support her claims. For instance, Sarah quotes Zimmer when she states, “...instead of reproducing sexually, the first marbled crayfish was able to induce her own eggs to start dividing into embryos. The offspring, all females, inherited identical copies of her three sets of chromosomes. They were clones.”
    Overall, this review is very well written, however there are a few things that can be improved. Although Sarah incorporated a couple of quotes into her review, I wish she included more, as it would not just make her review more interesting, but also provide additional opinions on this topic. Lastly, if Sarah wanted to take her review to the next level, she could have obtained outside information and incorporated this into her article.
    By reading this review, I learned how this issue is relevant in today’s society. Also, this review allowed me to expand my knowledge on biology. Overall, Sarah’s review is very well written and shows a great understanding of this article.

    ReplyDelete