Clio Dakolias
AP Bio
Mr. Ippolito
February 5, 2017
CE 15
Fountain, Henry. “The Next Big Volcano Could Briefly Cool Earth. NASA Wants to Be Ready.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 1 Feb. 2018, www.nytimes.com/2018/02/01/climate/volcano-geoengineering.html?rref=collection/sectioncollection/science&action=click&contentCollection=science®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=1&pgtype=sectionfront.
For Current Event 15, I chose to review an article from The New York Times titled “The Next Big Volcano Could Briefly Cool Earth. NASA Wants to Be Ready,” by Henry Fountain. Volcanic eruptions are responsible for releasing molten rock, or lava, from deep within the Earth, forming new rock on Earth’s surface. But eruptions also have an impact on Earth’s atmosphere. The gases and dust particles thrown into the atmosphere during volcanic eruptions have influences on the climate. Most of the particles- typically droplets of sulfuric acid -spewed from volcanoes cool the planet by shading incoming radiation. The tiny particles are so light that they can stay in the stratosphere for months, blocking sunlight and causing cooling over large areas of the Earth. This temporary cooling effect can last for months or years, depending on the characteristics of the eruption. In 1991, a volcano in the Philippines- Pinatubo -spewed a cubic mile of rock, ash, and sulfur dioxide gas into the atmosphere. The gas spread around the world, and formed aerosols by combining with water vapor. The consequential result was a drop in average global temperatures by about one degree Fahrenheit for a period of several years. Such eruptions are one of the biggest natural influences on the climate, and eruptions such as Pinatubo are a natural analog of geoengineering, the intervening in the atmosphere to deliberately cool the planet. Scientists, including some from NASA, are planning to study the next big volcanic eruption in order to learn how techniques could be utilized and carried out. Alan Robock, a Rutgers University researcher, stated the following: “‘...even if there were no such thing as geoengineering, it’s still important to understand how volcanoes affect climate.’” While the plan to study the next big volcanic eruption has been in discussion for years, it has gained some momentum, as well as urgency in recent weeks. “Mount Agung, a volcano in Bali, began erupting at the end of November. Agung’s last major eruption occurred in 1963, and should it fully blow with similar fury it could pump enough sulfur dioxide gas high enough into the atmosphere to have a measurable cooling effect.” Many large volcanic eruptions which rank high on an “explosivity index,” or a scale from 0 to 8 depending largely on the volume of ejected as and gas, are not necessarily helpful to study. This is because the index does not necessarily correlate to impact on climate, as the ash and gas has to be expelled upward rather than laterally to have a measurable cooling effect. NASA researchers are in the process of mapping out a plan to monitor the next large eruption, whether it be Agung or another volcano. Even if learning more about major eruptions’ does not lead to progress in geoengineering, it is still imperative to learn more about volcanoes’ impact on the climate, in both positive and negative lights.
Geoengineering offers the hope of temporarily reversing some aspects of global warming and allowing the natural climate to be substantially preserved whilst greenhouse gas emissions are brought under control and removed from the atmosphere by natural or artificial processes. Studying volcanoes can help to further these plans, which could have a large impact on Earth. Climate change is important because it is happening, and it might not be visible to some, but the Earth is rapidly changing in a completely irreversible way, and extreme weather is becoming much more deadly and dangerous. As climate change and greenhouse gases begin to take a larger toll on the future of our planet, measures to slow down the rate of warming are becoming more desperate and risky. Many argue that the risks of geoengineering, such as the possibility of the proposed techniques falling short of predictions, outweigh the possible benefits, but we are at a pivotal time, where something must be done before it is too late to save our planet, and that time is racing closer and closer. Some argue about the ethics of geoengineering, such as the question as to if humans have the right to change the climate deliberately. This argument has little substance, as humans are arguably solely responsible for climate change, and it is therefore our duty to do all we can to attempt to save the planet.
Fountain, the author, did a great job on this article, including quotations from different studies and researchers, and discussing the effect of major eruptions on the atmosphere as well as the technique of geoengineering. The overall article was very well written, but the author should have included more about the importance of stopping climate change before it is too late. There was no sense of urgency about the article, which was definitely something they could have done better, as climate change is a very real and current problem that affects the future of our planet.
Peyton Kinon
ReplyDeleteAP Biology
Current Event #15 Comment
2/5/18
Citation:
Fountain, Henry. “The Next Big Volcano Could Briefly Cool Earth. NASA Wants to Be Ready.” The New York Times, The New York Times, 1 Feb. 2018.
Hyperlink:
www.nytimes.com/2018/02/01/climate/volcano-geoengineering.html?rref=collection/sectioncollection/science&action=click&contentCollection=science®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=1&pgtype=sectionfront
Clio does a good job describing how volcanic eruptions affect the atmosphere. She very easily explains that the dust and gases released by the eruptions can affect the climate by blocking out the sun and slightly cooling certain areas of the earth. She does a good job explaining the real world consequences of this very well, too. She talks about a volcanic eruption in the Philippines in 1991. This eruption lowered the global average temperature by one degree Fahrenheit for several years. She also does a good job at explaining how geoengineering could be better understanded by studying the long term impacts the big volcano eruptions have on the average global temperatures.
One mistake that I found was that in the first paragraph, she says “have influences” when she should have said “influences.” This could have been fixed by proofreading. Also, the sentence “Fountain, the author, did a great job on this article, including quotations from different studies and researchers, and discussing the effect of major eruptions on the atmosphere as well as the technique of geoengineering,” is a little confusing upon first read and could sound less confusing with some revision.
This article was very interesting. I never knew that this happened or that it could happen. I chose this article because it sounded interesting. If I ever work for NASA or become a volcanologist, this knowledge will come in handy.
AP Bio
ReplyDeleteOlivia Scotti
2/12/18
Current Event # 16
Fountain, Henry. “The Next Big Volcano Could Briefly Cool Earth. NASA Wants to Be Ready.”
The New York Times, The New York Times, 1 Feb. 2018, www.nytimes.com/2018/02/01/climate/volcano-geoengineering.html?rref=collection/sectioncollection/science&action=click&contentCollection=science®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=1&pgtype=sectionfront.
There were many aspects of Clio’s review written well. One part of her review that I felt she did particularly well was her description of how the next volcano could cool the earth. For instance she states how “Most of the particles- typically droplets of sulfuric acid -spewed from volcanoes cool the planet by shading incoming radiation. The tiny particles are so light that they can stay in the stratosphere for months, blocking sunlight and causing cooling over large areas of the Earth. ” Through this summary the reader is able to understand the main point of the article that is being reviewed. Another part of the review which was done well was the addition of quotes from research on this topic. For example, “‘Rutgers University researcher, stated the following: “‘...even if there were no such thing as geoengineering, it’s still important to understand how volcanoes affect climate.’”’ Through this the reader understands what research was conducted. This is also allows the reader to understand the tone of the article through direct quotes from the passage. Another part of the review that was done well was her ability to describe how this discovery is beneficial to the rest of the world. For instance she states, “ As climate change and greenhouse gases begin to take a larger toll on the future of our planet, measures to slow down the rate of warming are becoming more desperate and risky.” This strengthened her review because the reader was able to see how research is useful for a lot of the population.
Although there were many parts of Clio’s review written well there were areas for improvement. One part of her review which could have been improved was her critique paragraph. Although she did mention the negatives and positives of the article I wish she had been less general when stating her positives and gone into more detail. Through adding more specific details about the positives of the article the reader would have had a better understanding of the article. Another part of the article that could have been improved was if she added more details about the new discoveries that could occur from this study. Also this would help strengthen her description of the research as a whole.
Overall, I felt Clio wrote a strong review of this article which the reader could easily understand. Her review was written clearly and smoothly which allowed the reader to learn about the topic more easily and understand the research conducted. I enjoyed reading this review because I learned more about how volcanoes could affect earth so much. Overall, I liked how she described the research that was done and the effects on the present world. Through her discussion of this article the reader got a better grasp on the topic and the importance of this new research.
Cory Ramundo
ReplyDeleteMr. Ippolito
AP Biology
1 March 2018
Fountain, Henry. “The Next Big Volcano Could Briefly Cool Earth. NASA Wants to Be Ready.”
The New York Times, The New York Times, 1 Feb. 2018, www.nytimes.com/2018/02/01/climate/volcano-geoengineering.html?rref=collection/sectioncollection/science&action=click&contentCollection=science®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=1&pgtype=sectionfront.
Clio writes a very informative review on the article, “The Next Big Volcano Could Briefly Cool Earth. NASA Wants to Be Ready.” She does many good things in this review, including adding many quotes to back her opinions and thoughts. For example, she quotes, ““‘Rutgers University researcher, stated the following: “‘...even if there were no such thing as geoengineering, it’s still important to understand how volcanoes affect climate.’”’ This establishes some credibility for herself and makes the reader more inclined to believe her points. Another thing Clio does well is showing how this has a great impact on the world. She was able to relate it back to a population as a whole and climate change. This grabs the reader’s attention and keeps them much more focused. Lastly, Clio does a good job of presenting her information in a clear, organized way. She presented everything in logical order, building up to how it a volcanic eruption could cool the earth, and it made perfect sense to the reader. It was not confusing, but clear, which helped me stay focused.
Although Clio does many good things, there is also a couple of bad things that she does. First off, I felt that her critique paragraph was a bit weak. She did not really dive into how it could have been improved, but merely scratched the surface with somewhat vague suggestions. Furthermore, there were some grammatical and spelling errors through her review, which actually distracted me as a reader when I would find these errors. It distracted me from the main points she was trying to convey and could have been solved with some revisions.
Overall, Clio wrote an amazing review that was extremely eye opening. I find it amazing that a volcanic eruption could actually cool the earth and it was very interesting to see the research behind this. All in all this was a great review, and I am now more educated on volcanoes and their effects.