Alyssa Lee
Mr. Ippolito
Current Event #3
9/5/18
“Octopuses given Mood Drug 'Ecstasy' Reveal Genetic Link to Evolution of Social Behaviors in Humans.” ScienceDaily, ScienceDaily, 20 Sept. 2018, www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/09/180920175206.htm.
Evolution is an intriguing field of science- not only because it tracks the incredible adaptations of organisms to their environments over time, but also the fact that we can uncover links between two species that are seemingly completely unrelated. Such is the case in the experiments of Dr. Gül Dölen, assistant professor at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, and his colleague Dr. Eric Edsinger from the Marine Biological Laboratory in Massachusetts. Dölen recently conducted an experiment to test his hypothesis that octopuses are distant relatives of human beings. Octopuses are supposedly rather antisocial creatures and tend to avoid contact with any live beings, including other octopuses (with the exception of mating, although even then octopuses tend to return to their solitude after ensuring the inheritance of their genes). This runs contrary to the ways in which human beings, who require bonding and physical contact with others, tend to behave. Nevertheless, Dölen surmised that there may be similarities between social behavior caused by neurotransmitters, or “signals that neurons pass between each other to communicate”, of both species. Upon examination, they found that the genomic sequence for the transporter binding serotonin, a neurotransmitter that regulates mood, to the neuron is nearly identical in the California two-spot octopus and human beings. Thus, the two researchers set up an experiment to test their hypothesis- they filled three chambers, one that only contained water, one that contained an action figure beneath a cage, and one that contained a lab-bred male or female octopus beneath a cage. They connected these three chambers and added liquified MDMA (a.k.a. “Ecstasy”, a drug that induces heightened sensation, energy, and pleasure in humans) to the control beakers where the octopuses were first placed. Without adding MDMA, the octopuses tended to stay away from the caged octopus. The results of the experiments were profound- all four octopuses that acted as test subjects were drawn to the chamber with the caged octopus and demonstrated unusually affectionate behavior such as hugging and “putting their mouth parts on the cage”. This was especially shocking behavior because it demonstrated that at one point along the evolutionary spectrum, octopuses evolved along the same lines as human beings did (in terms of social behavior). This may open up the possibility for future studies in the same field, as we now realize that there could be many evolutionary links between species that were previously thought to be have evolved separately.
These findings are extremely important to the field of evolution because they have introduced the possibility that we as humans are far more entwined with other species along the path of evolution than we had once believed. If we are indeed genetically related to octopuses- a species that could not seem any more different from humans- then who is to say that we are not distant relatives of beetles or birds? This could lead to a whole new study examining different facets in which human beings could be related to other species, a study that could possibly turn our knowledge of evolution on its head. Scientists could examine a variety of new possible links between organisms as seemingly different from one another as fish and elephants. The results of these sorts of experiments could also aid us in explaining our physical, mental, and physiological developments and behaviors when compared to those of other organisms. Perhaps most importantly, this experiment provides further evidence (albeit perhaps not completely concrete evidence without the input of other researchers) of the digression of evolution, or its tendency to favor branching and multiple evolutionary pathways rather than being a more linear process. It helps us to gain greater understanding as to the ways in which human beings have evolved over time, and how, even despite our physical appearances, organisms that are as advanced along the evolutionary process as human beings could share a common ancestor with organisms as formless and gelatinous as octopuses.
This article is particularly strong because it clearly and concisely explains the specifics of the experiments as well as the science behind it- for example, it describes the basic layout of the experiment with the three chambers, and explains the scientists’ motives for conducting it (i.e. to test their hypothesis that stated that octopuses and human beings shared a remarkably similar genomic code in social behavior, specifically for serotonin receptors). There is little to no confusion as to how and why the researchers made the conclusions that they did based on the results of their experiment, and the article states the information in a way that makes the steps seem logical and rather easy to follow. Despite these strengths, there are a few weaknesses in this article as well as the experiment. In terms of the article itself, there are some issues that the author should address- for example, the author did not explain what MDMA was, and for readers that did not know what the acronym was referring to, the final connection between humans and octopuses would not make sense to them. I myself did not understand until I researched in more depth and found that “ecstasy” and MDMA were referring to the same drug. Additionally, the author did not explain why the octopuses tended to avoid only male octopuses, and this was my main source of confusion while reading this article. Although the reader could assume that males were avoided because the test subjects were male, this conclusion is uncertain and so the author could benefit from explaining exactly why male octopuses were more likely to be avoided than females (especially if some of the test subjects were female octopuses).
In Alyssa Lee’s review of “Octopuses given mood drug ‘ecstasy’ reveal genetic link to evolution of social behaviors in humans,” she was very thorough in covering all of the topics described in the summary. Not only did she explain the main components of the article- the usually antisocial nature of octopuses, the original genomic tests conveying some similarity in human and octopus genes coding for the serotonin transporter, and a detailed account of the MDMA experiment- but in some places she also went in even more depth than the article by clarifying to the reader how shocking these results are given that humans in fact are very social creatures relative to other animals, which was something the article implied but didn’t outright state, and by connecting this article back to the broad significance of two evolutionarily very different species having some unusual similarity. A second very strong point in Lee’s summary was that she gave two specific examples of a strength and a weakness in the article rather than just simply giving some broad criticism: she backed up her claim of the “clarity” of the portrayal of the experiment by describing the important aspects of the experiment the article included and that they were given in a logical order, and she gave a very specific weakness taken directly from the article: it wasn’t explained why the octopuses under normal circumstances tended to only avoid male caged octopuses (as supposed to female caged octopuses). A third strength of Lee’s review was that her “impact” paragraph didn’t just recite an impact stated in the article: she stated a potential use for the type of experiment used in the article more generally (to compare human characteristics with other species) and she explained that although there are some similarities between humans and octopuses, this lesson was also an “exception that proves the rule” with regard to emphasizing just how much a common ancestor’s descendents leading to octopuses and humans had to branch off from each other in that time.
ReplyDeleteDespite the review’s strength, there are some minor areas for improvement. The first is that the genomic tests weren’t to test a hypothesis that octopuses are “distant relatives of humans.” It was to test a very specific possible similarity between the two with regard to a serotonin transporter; all living things are distant relatives in the sense that they branched off from the first life forms on earth. If a reader simply went by the review, he or she would already have a somewhat misleading idea of the article’s premise, and that is the most important aspect a review needs to have correct. Secondly, although the “impact” paragraph doesn’t simply restate an impact from the article, it could go a little deeper by describing why it is important to perform studies comparing humans to other distantly related species. How does that help the progress of society at large? That would get more to the heart of what the second paragraph is meant for.
One revelation I had while reading this article is that the fact that humans and octopuses have the same transporter for serotonin is somehow shocking to neuroscientists. This is a very important discrepancy from the book I am currently reading about the biology of human behavior by Robert Sapolsky, in which he states that with the exception of humans and other social primates containing a more recently evolved type of neuron in the insula and anterior cingulate subregions of the frontal cortex called Von Economo neurons (which is important since these subregions deal with the advanced human traits that make us so social: empathy and moral disgust), humans only differ from more “simple” animals in the much relatively higher number of neurons and connections between them, whereas most organisms have nearly identical types of neurotransmitters and neuron structure. According to that theory, it should be no shock that the serotonin transporters of humans and octopuses are identical, whereas this article considers that significant.