Tuesday, September 22, 2015

More Evidence for Coming Black Hole Collision




More Evidence for Coming Black Hole Collision

Black holes are ultra-dense objects that suck in everything from stars, gases, and even light. Each galaxy has at least one supermassive black hole and when these galaxies coalesce, the black holes are forced to orbit each other. In most cases, the black holes cannot get close enough to merge because the gravity of nearby planets and stars hold them back; however, in a galaxy 3.5 billion light-years from earth, an unusual event has developed. Last year, a team of scientist discovered two massive black holes weighing more than a billion suns combined, set to converge with each other. There are not enough planets or stars nearby to hold them back, and when these two black holes will meet they will release as much energy as 100 million supernova explosions in the form of gravitational waves. For reference, supernova’s have so much energy that for a brief period they outshine the entire galaxy. The evidence for this collision was a flickering coming from the center of that galaxy, specifically from a quasar, a bright mass of light and energy, called PG 1302-102. Recently, new evidence also was discovered to back this prediction. Daniel D’Orazio of Columbia University and his colleagues predicted that light coming from the quasar, is actually coming from a disk of gas surrounding one of the black holes. They predicted that the closer the black holes come together, the more light will be emitted from the disk and accelerated by the Doppler Effect. They also predicted that the variation would be greater in ultraviolet light, which they later confirmed from analyzing their data. The model D’Orazio and his colleagues came up with suggest the black holes are only 200 billion miles away and would collide within the next 100,000 years. But, because the galaxy is so far away from earth, it is possible that the collision has already occurred, and the effects would only reach us in the future.
This article and the research shown in it are important for understanding the characteristics of black holes and collecting more evidence to back the theory of general relativity. Black holes are a mystery to scientists, simply because they can’t be directly seen and there are many theories as to what happens when something approaches a black hole. There are a lot of observations and data explaining some of the behaviours of black holes, but discoveries such as these help reveal more of the mystery. Similarly, general relativity has passed experiments, discoveries, and observations, but “some of its predictions can be tested only in the most extreme gravitational environments, namely black holes.” Essentially, the more data we collect about black holes and the gravity waves they often release, the more we will learn about “the secrets of gravity.”
This article was well-written, but I had a few issues with the way it explained a lot of the evidence. The article assumed that the reader had general knowledge of the different types of stars, which was sometimes annoying because I had to search up a lot of terms. The author was also not clear with explaining what exactly the new data proved and why it was important to confirming the theory of the collision. I had to re-read the part explaining the evidence they discovered because it was confusing and disjointed. Overall though, the author did explain some essential parts of black holes, which was nice since it cleared up a lot of misconceptions, I just wish he had been clearer when explaining the evidence. 

Overbye, Dennis. "More Evidence for Coming Black Hole Collision." The New York Times. The New York Times, 21 Sept. 2015. Web. 22 Sept. 2015.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/22/science/space/more-evidence-for-coming-black-hole-collision.html?action=click&contentCollection=science&region=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=6&pgtype=sectionfront

5 comments:

  1. Ms. Dhar,

    I thought your review of “More Evidence for Coming Black Hole Collision” was quite interesting. You said that the article was difficult to comprehend and that you had to reread it several times to understand it; however, I thought you actually did a great job explaining the situation with the black holes that are 3.5 billion light-years away from Earth. The article discussed about two black holes that are set to collide, which is unusual as nearby planets and stars’ gravity usually cause the black holes to diverge. There was a recent research published that supported this theory. Also, your writing has nice flow and transition, making the difficult reading easier to understand. Going from talking about black holes in general, you specified, so it shows that there is progress in the discoveries of information about black holes. It shows that even if many things are still unknown, we are making progress. Connecting to that idea, your review was impactful because it clearly explained why this discovery is important in the astrological field. I thought you summed it up nicely at the end, saying that “essentially, the more data we collect about black holes and the gravity waves they often release, the more we will learn about ‘the secrets of gravity.’”

    Though your review was rather excellent, one thing that you could have discussed more about is how the discoveries were made; maybe it’s because the article itself didn’t talk much about it, but I am just interested in the process that occurred that led the scientists to observe this phenomenon. Another thing that you could have added was maybe more statistics or quotes because that can be powerful. I know you included one quote, but maybe expanding on that would be nice.

    I decided to read this review because it was the top one on the blog when I first went on, but mainly because the idea of black holes and astrology really fascinated me. The sense of mystery and the knowledge that we humans don’t have very much knowledge about what is out there is intriguing. The point that most stuck out to me when reading the review was the fact that “because the galaxy is so far away from earth, it is possible that the collision has already occurred, and the effects would only reach us in the future.” I remember talking about this in Earth Science, and it just blows my mind how there isn’t really the concept of time in space. Galaxies could already be dead or extinguished, but we would not even know because our technology is not advanced enough. Thank you for sharing this article, and nice job!

    Overbye, Dennis. "More Evidence for Coming Black Hole Collision." The New York Times. The New York Times, 21 Sept. 2015. Web. 22 Sept. 2015.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/22/science/space/more-evidence-for-coming-black-hole-collision.html?action=click&contentCollection=science&region=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=6&pgtype=sectionfront

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I enjoyed reading the review of the New York Times article "More Evidence for Coming Black Hole Collision.” The description and background of what a black hole is was easy to comprehend and well-written. For example, black holes are ultra-dense and capable of engulfing stars, gases and light. Most black holes are unable to merge due to the force of gravity. The significance of the new research was clearly addressed. Two massive black holes will combine with each other. Furthermore, supernovas have the capability to outshine the entire galaxy and the energy released by the two black holes is equal to one-hundred million supernova explosions in the form of gravitational waves. The citation and explanation of the research conducted by the scientists added credibility to the summarized review. Daniel D’Orazio of Columbia University saw the PG 1302-102, a flickering light coming from a quasar, a bright mass of light and energy. He hypothesized that the light coming from the quasar was really coming from the gas of a black hole.

    The importance of the new discovery would have been interesting to hear in the context of prior black hole research and discoveries. What have other scientists discovered about the mysterious phenomenon of black holes? Additionally, the summarized description of the research would have been strengthened by direct quotes from Daniel D’Orazio and other experts in the field of study.

    This article was informative. This research related to many topics discussed in earth science, such as, quasars and supernovae. This research truly exposes more about the phenomenon of black holes. It is fascinating that black holes are only 200 billion miles away, yet they could collide within the next 100,000 years. However, the galaxy is so far away from Earth that the effects would only occur in the future.



    Overbye, Dennis. "More Evidence for Coming Black Hole Collision." The New York Times.The New York Times, 21 Sept. 2015. Web. 22 Sept. 2015. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/22/science/space/more-evidence-for-coming-black-hole-collision.html?action=click&contentCollection=science&region=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=6&pgtype=sectionfront

    ReplyDelete
  4. Even with such a challenging topic, it was clear that Yosman had a clear understanding of the information presented in the article, which was evident through her use of vocabulary and explanations of different phenomenons. She defined terms such as “quasar” and “Doppler effect” in a way that showed that she completely grasped the subjects at hand. This helped me understand the topic that she was explaining despite its complex nature. She also mentioned specific scientists and experiments, which gave her review more credibility and allowed me to think about more specific examples. Her explanation of Daniel D’Orazio and his work at Columbia University with his colleagues gave a specific example of a discovery and expanded upon it. This made her review sound more informed and helped me to understand how exactly this discovery contributed to the topic of black holes. Her application of the information presented in the article to society also helped me draw connections between how knowledge of space can directly apply to our lives. She states that knowledge of space will help further our knowledge of gravity and general relativity. While reading her explanation, I felt that the subject matter related to me more than it had before because such topics can directly tie into our lives even though such a broad topic can feel far away from us.
    Although Yosman’s review was informative and well-written, some aspects made it hard to understand. She used the vocabulary clearly and accurately, but many times I wasn’t completely sure what she was talking about because of her use of such technical and advanced terms. If she substituted words like “coalesce” for easier vocabulary or explained concepts such as “PG 1302-02” more in depth, it would have helped me grasp the concept more easily. I also think that Yosman could have concluded her summary paragraph in a more clear and effective manner. While she did an amazing job at explaining the background information, her statement that the collision’s effects would “only reach us in the future” was a little vague. If she provided a little more information, such as a general estimate of when the effects of the collision would reach the earth or what scientists speculate the effects will be, would have been beneficial to her review and left the reader more informed.
    I think that Yosman’s review was very informative and I learned a lot about the article. Although I had never studied the topic of black holes before, I was able to comprehend what she was talking about. I chose to read this article and review because it was an interesting topic and the effects of such a phenomenon in space can have profound effects on earth. It changed my understanding of how factors outside of the earth could change our lives. The subject of black holes and extreme gravitational environments seem remote from us, but it can help our understanding of physics and predict its immediate effect on us.

    Overbye, Dennis. "More Evidence for Coming Black Hole Collision." The New York Times. The New York Times, 21 Sept. 2015. Web. 22 Sept. 2015. .

    ReplyDelete
  5. I thought that this review was very well written. For every piece of writing it’s always important to provide background information so the reader knows what he or she is reading about. This review provides the necessary background information for people who aren’t familiar with black holes and uses specific examples to connect the general factual statements. There is also very good flow within the paragraphs. Everything transitions in a very logical manner. First is the introductory information for the reader, then the connection to the current event, and the article review. I also noticed that the review took the flaws of the original article and corrected the issues that it had for this review. It states that the original article had an issue of assuming the reader knew extensive information about stars and that took away from the average reader. This review was written in such a way that someone could know nothing about the topic and still take away from it.
    I think that this review is very well written. From what I can tell, this is a very strong review and does not have any clear weaknesses. The only thing, stylistically, that could be different would be to include a quote from the expert after discussing his research.
    I chose to read this review because the topic drew me in. Black holes are very mysterious and very little is known about how they work. They are also very dangerous and to see that two of an astronomical size will be colliding in the future is a very scary thought. It really makes the reader think about how humanity will have to develop new types of technology to survive the dangerous special occurrences that have the potential to wipe out all of mankind.

    ReplyDelete