"Study Gives Hope of Altering Genes to Repel H.I.V."
Grady, Denise. "Study Gives Hope of Altering Genes to Repel H.I.V." The New York Times. The New York Times, 05 Mar. 2014. Web. 05 Mar. 2014.http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/06/health/study-gives-hope-of-altering-genes-to-repel-hiv.html?ref=science
I
read the article, “Study Gives Hope of Altering Genes to Repel H.I.V.” written by
Denise Grady. In the article, she discusses how the possibility of altering
genes to resists the virus that cause AIDS which was previously though to be
impossible, is now possible as shown by recent studies. The research was done
by taking 12 people infected with H.I.V. and scientists used the technique
of “gene editing” to get rid of a protein on the patients’ immune cells
that the virus must latch onto to invade the cells. The “cells were removed
from the patients, treated and then dripped back into their bloodstreams
through an intravenous line.” Scientists believe that if enough cells are
engineered to resists the AIDS virus then this disease could be cured. Dr.
Anthony S. Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases said that “It’s exciting, interesting, elegant science. But a lot of
‘ifs’ need to be addressed before you can say ‘Wow, this could really work.”
Dr. Fauci also discusses if this is the most effective form of treatment
because the “gene editing” is a very complex treatment, whereas the anti-viral
pills are fairly simple. The study obtained it basis from a discovery in 1990.
The discovery found that a small percentage of people are resistant to H.I.V.
thanks to a lucky mutation that causes their immune cells to lack CCR5, a
protein that gives the virus a foothold. In people with one copy of the mutated
gene, the infection progresses more slowly than in those who have normal CCR5.
People who have inherited two copies of the mutated gene, one from each parent,
are highly resistant to H.I.V. and may never become infected despite repeated
exposure.
For the people
that are affected by H.I.V. this research could be the different between life
and death. About 1.6 million people die a year from H.I.V./ AIDS. This option
may be an improvement from the anti-viral medications because they have bad
side effects. The research on gene editing, while it is still in the primary
stages, is something that should be considered as a long-term solution for this
virus.
This article
was very well written and I enjoyed reading it. The author used specific
information about the studies and how scientists are trying to find a cure for
H.I.V. She also included specific quotes, which enriched the article. I am
interested to see what the results of this research will be. Overall, the
article taught me that the process of “gene cutting” can be used to change the
genes in cells and then put them back in the body. Maybe this can be used to
cure other disease in the future if it is successful.
In the review of this article titled, Study Gives Hope of Altering Genes to Repel H.I.V., Abigail gives the reader well-written insight into what this article is trying to expose. One aspect of this review that was well presented was her ability to describe the experiment that was completed in order to do away with H.I.V. She explains that research was done by taking 12 people infected with H.I.V. and scientists used a technique of “gene editing” to get rid of a protein on the patients’ immune cells that the virus must latch onto to invade the cell. Another aspect that was well presented was her ability to incorporate insightful quotes that were included in the article. She included a quote from Dr. Anthony Fauci who said, “It’s exciting, interesting, elegant science. But a lot of ‘ifs’ need to be addressed before you can say ‘Wow, this could really work.” This was a nice quote because it exposed the fact that this process is very difficult, causing doubts. Lastly, she incorporated important statistics that were vital for the reader to know. She claimed that 1.6 million people die a year from H.I.V./AIDS. This being said, this new research could serve as a new tool in saving the lives of millions of people. Although this review was easy to read and very informative, it could have been made a little bit better in two ways. One way would be that I wish she expanded a little more on why there are doubts in regards to this research. Another aspect that could have made this review a little bit better would have been getting to know a little more on where Abigail stood on this whole topic. I would have liked to know more of what her point of view was. I was impressed by reading this article and this review because I had just recently read an article on curing H.I.V. in babies, but this new information leaves me a lot more hopeful considering it could save the lives of dying victims.
ReplyDelete