Ever heard of schizophrenia? Those who suffer from it usually are characterized by their hallucinations and delusion thinking. For generations, this mental illness has proven to be an enigma to scientists; however it became slightly less mysterious late January after the discovery of the role genetics plays. It is natural for the average human’s brain to undergo synaptic pruning, a process in which the brain disposes of useless connections between neurons as it ages; however, “people with schizophrenia have a gene variant that apparently facilitates aggressive ‘tagging’ of connections for pruning, in effect accelerating the process.” In addition, MHC is a human genome that is usually mentioned in previous studies relating to the disorder; in fact a 2007 study displayed MHC’s involvement in synaptic pruning. A research team, led by Steven McCarroll and Aswin Sekar found that the MHC contains four common variants of a gene called C4 which then produced C4-A and C4-B, two kinds of proteins. Upon analyzation of 64,000 people, the study confirmed that schizophrenia patients were prone to have overactive forms of C4-A compared to the others. Dr. Steven’s lab mice with the C4 genes expressed blatant signs of something wrong in synaptic pruning. This led to the conclusion that overproduction of C4-A could result in too much pruning, which would explain the thinner prefrontal layers in schizophrenic patients and why most patients are so young (teenagers/twenties) However despite this leap of knowledge, much is to be questioned in the field of biological psychiatry. “Carrying a gene variant that facilitates aggressive pruning is hardly enough to cause schizophrenia; far too many other factors are at work. Having such a variant, Dr. McCarroll estimates, would increase a person’s risk by about 25 percent over the 1 percent base rate of schizophrenia — that is, to 1.25 percent.”Although the new finding will not lead to new treatments or medication soon, it marks the beginning to truly understanding the disorder.
The article made it blatant that the field of biological psychiatry is an painstaking one. Human psychology does share its roots within biology in the end, however uncovering these roots are harder as there is so much unknown about the field due to amount of unwarranted factors present. Although the newfound understanding gained from McCarrol and Sekar’s work cannot automatically lead to treatments, it allows for others researchers to build upon their research and ultimately paves a route for the creation of possible treatments.
The strengths within the article was clearly the amount of research the author put into comprehending this intricate topic as well as quote integration and citing data as well. However, I felt there were some weaknesses within the author’s strengths such as the overflow of information. I had to read the article several times before I actually could understand what exactly I had read. Also some of the quotes were a bit simplistic, merely confirming something the author had already written. Overall it was a really interesting read, but if the author worked on simple things like simplifying what exactly was so groundbreaking about the discovery of the researchers I think this would have made a huge difference.
Hyperlink:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/28/health/schizophrenia-cause-synaptic-pruning-brain-psychiatry.html?_r=0
Carey, Benedict. "Scientists Move Closer to Understanding Schizophrenia’s Cause." The New York
Times. The New York Times, 27 Jan. 2016. Web. 07 Feb. 2016.