AP Biology Cyrus
Adamiyatt
Pappas, Stephanie. "5 Apocalypse Catastrophes — and Why
They Won't Happen." Msnbc.com. Msnbc Digital Network, 18 Dec. 2012. Web.
18 Dec. 2012.
I
read the article, “5 Apocalypse Catastrophes – and Why They Won’t Happen.” By
Stephanie Pappas. With December
21, 2012, the date that for years has been speculated to be the end of the
world because the Mayan calendar ends on that day, approaching, the topic of
the end of the world is everywhere.
This article addresses 5 of the claims as to why the world will end this
Friday, and debunks them simply.
The first prediction, that the sun will kill us all, is easily debunked
as it would be a result of extreme solar storms and NASA has recorded some of
the lowest “solar maximums” in years.
The next, that the Earth’s magnetic poles will flip-flop is completely
unreasonable because although they poles do occasionally flip-flop, it takes
periods of hundreds of thousands of years to occur. Next, the author addresses the myth that a planet will
collide with the earth and destroy it, but that of course cannot happen as
something so large coming at earth would have been seen by scientists years
ago. The author proceeds to
address the myth that the planets will align and it will somehow negatively
impact earth is debunked simply because as NASA has reported, planetary
alignment will not occur within the next couple of decades. Lastly, the author addresses the myth
that the Sun and Earth may align and cause a total earth blackout, however,
NASA rejected these claims with only a few words, “There is no such alignment.”
I
chose this article because with December 21 approaching, these myths have been
prevalent. I was interested in
learning more about this after the science seminar in November, and was glad to
see that more results confirmed the absurdity of the idea that the world will
be destroyed on December 21.
Obviously, considering the magnitude of the devastation of these rumored
myths, the fact that they are shown to be clearly false by NASA is tremendously
uplifting.
I
thought that this article was very well organized and well written; however,
there were still a few flaws. I
appreciated the way that the author put each myth into a separate category and
addressed each one in a concise manner.
I do wish that the author included more scientific information however,
as she often cited simple phrases in which NASA denied the claims, but did not
provide substantial evidence as to why NASA denied the claims.